cropped-GHT-logo.jpg
  • Home
  • About GHT
    • Our History
    • Our Activities
      • The Blue Plaque Scheme
    • Chair’s Report
    • Policies and Statements
  • Glossop’s Heritage
    • Places
    • People
    • Industry
    • Events
    • Organisations
    • Military
  • Support GHT
  • News & Resources
    • Walks
    • History Series
  • Contact GHT
  • Home
  • About GHT
    • Our History
    • Our Activities
      • The Blue Plaque Scheme
    • Chair’s Report
    • Policies and Statements
  • Glossop’s Heritage
    • Places
    • People
    • Industry
    • Events
    • Organisations
    • Military
  • Support GHT
  • News & Resources
    • Walks
    • History Series
  • Contact GHT

Home » GHTArchives » Melandra – Glossop’s Forgotten Fort – Part 5

Melandra – Glossop’s Forgotten Fort – Part 5

  • Published: December 11, 2021

A Monument at Risk

In 2012, 730 people crowded into two “Melandra Days”, held by the Archaeological Society (GLAS). The aim was to drum up support for a bid to the Lottery for nearly £100,000 to run a 5-week “community dig” at the fort.

After the Melandra Field Group, which had watched over it since the 1960s, was disbanded in 1984, and regular digs ceased in 1998, its condition had gone steadily downhill. Only the paths and areas outside were mowed, so the centre was invaded by ankle-breaking tussock grass. The drain, installed in 1974, from the principia, the headquarters building, failed and it became waterlogged and overgrown (pics, 1980s and now). Bushes grew on the ramparts, and some became trees, with destructive roots running deep into the 1900-year-old structures.

Photograph of Melandra in 1980s and now

The signs went, too – the interpretation board, and two of the plaques, installed in the 1960s, which told people that it was protected as a monument of national importance. Not that this made much difference; the rare mentions in the Chronicle, which had once carried stories about exciting finds and plans for museums, were now all about vandalism.

And the view also went. In the 1970s Glossop Council had planted trees on the formerly bare hillsides around, but as they grew they blocked the panoramic views of the valley below and the hills beyond. The few visitors not only had no idea what they were looking at, but could no longer appreciate why the Romans had chosen that spot.

The hope was that a successful dig would draw attention to the fort and persuade the Council that, with better maintenance, it could become the tourist attraction envisaged in the 1970s. However, the Lottery rejected the bid – before they would fund a dig, they wanted the Council to agree an improvement plan.

The recession was biting, so the Council proposed to transfer ownership to a “community trust” which could access funds not available to local authorities. However, this made little headway. Unpaid volunteers were reluctant to take responsibility for a large insecure site which could generate no income, and with no guaranteed funding beyond “seed money” from the Council, and some potential trustees were too old to be signing a 25-year lease.

GLAS members hacked away at the smaller bushes – the bigger trees were beyond them – and persuaded the Council to flail the tussock grass. However, it all grew back within months, so they approached Historic England, which had taken the site off its “At-Risk” Register when the trust scheme was mooted, and asked that it be put back on.

The upshot, in late 2019, was an agreement between Historic England and the Council that each would contribute £20,000 over 5 years to a joint management scheme. It was due to take effect in April 2020, but Covid intervened. Discussions are now resuming, but in the meantime the site is back on the At-Risk Register as “generally unsatisfactory with major localised problems…deteriorating and in need of management.”

Even when the scheme does proceed, £40,000 will go only a small way to restoring the site to its condition when landscaped in the 1970s. Some limited improvement, though, will hopefully make it easier to get more funds to complete the job. However, without sufficient maintenance it will then quickly revert to nature.

That can be avoided only if its upkeep is seen as worthwhile, given other demands on Council funds. In 1971 the Glossop Councillors thought it could be a major tourist magnet, something which the town was (and still is) lacking, and which would have knock-on benefits for the local economy.

What they failed to appreciate, though, was that a tourist attraction and an open public park, next to a road and a large housing estate, were fundamentally in conflict. Any future vision for Melandra will need to address that dilemma.

END OF SERIES

PREVIOUS – Part 4: The Plan

Share this post

Copyright ©1999-2026 Glossop Heritage Trust. All rights reserved.

  • enquiries@glossopheritage.co.uk
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settings Read More ACCEPT
This site uses cookies

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT